projects:picoatlas:picoatlasiv
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| projects:picoatlas:picoatlasiv [2011/08/26 21:54] – [Conclusion] jcoxon | projects:picoatlas:picoatlasiv [2011/08/26 21:57] (current) – [Conclusion] jcoxon | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| ===== Conclusion ===== | ===== Conclusion ===== | ||
| - | * The setup was very easy - having large indoors space to fill made getting the mass, lift and ascent rate much easier. This is vital for these foil balloons which small error margins. | + | * The setup was very easy - having |
| * The data shows that we did manage float for about 10 mins before we lost radio contact - this is great news but we'll need a further flight with a sustained float to actually prove it. | * The data shows that we did manage float for about 10 mins before we lost radio contact - this is great news but we'll need a further flight with a sustained float to actually prove it. | ||
| * Low altitude flights are hard to track - its difficult to get the widespread listeners as you do need to be quite close or have a good setup. This wasn't helped this time by what was most likely an antenna problem on the payload. | * Low altitude flights are hard to track - its difficult to get the widespread listeners as you do need to be quite close or have a good setup. This wasn't helped this time by what was most likely an antenna problem on the payload. | ||
| * Often we could hear the RTTY but weren' | * Often we could hear the RTTY but weren' | ||
projects/picoatlas/picoatlasiv.1314395683.txt.gz · Last modified: 2011/08/26 21:54 by jcoxon