parawing
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
parawing [2007/03/08 20:46] – mc | parawing [2008/07/19 23:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* equivalent parawing? | * equivalent parawing? | ||
- | Ideas: | + | - Feedback from MC: If you want to split up tasks, I could work on 2 way comms. |
- | * [[http:// | + | |
- | Links: | + | |
- | * Slope Soaring Sim (Free flight sim for mac and windows) [[http:// | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | - Feedback from MC: If you want to split up tasks, I could work on 2 way comms | + | |
Parawing won't mind going into wind, IMHO | Parawing won't mind going into wind, IMHO | ||
+ | |||
I think the Mk1 version could be steered from the ground, then Mk2 could be steered by software | I think the Mk1 version could be steered from the ground, then Mk2 could be steered by software | ||
+ | |||
It should be possible to have a much smaller payload, perhaps around the mass of a servo+batt+electronics, | It should be possible to have a much smaller payload, perhaps around the mass of a servo+batt+electronics, | ||
+ | ed: - Although reduced weight is a good thing in general, weight will help us control the wing. Also, when you factor in cameras and the actual mechanics, 750g seems like a more realistic target to me- we'll still have to be building light to get it in under that! | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ideas: | ||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[[projects:: | ||
parawing.1173386780.txt.gz · Last modified: 2008/07/19 23:30 (external edit)