communication:nova1_radio_system
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
communication:nova1_radio_system [2006/09/25 19:20] – rocketboy | communication:nova1_radio_system [2008/07/19 23:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== The NOVA1 Radio Data Downlink (by Steve Randall) ====== | ||
+ | The radio system used on NOVA1 was intended to be a test of what could be achieved using off-the-shelf | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** Figure 1 - NOVA1 radio system schematic ** | ||
+ | |||
+ | The whole system was built in a package that was about 70mm x 96mm x 30mm which contained the TNC, transmitter, | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** Figure 2 – NOVA1 Data Down-link Radio package ** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== TNC (Terminal Node Controller) ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | TNC’s are used by radio hams for data communication over narrow band FM audio channel. | ||
+ | The TNC provides a radio modem capability – converting the data coming from the host computer interface into a format suitable for transmission over a radio channel. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The TNC used is the TNX-X from Coastal Chipworks (see http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Transmitter ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The UK radio-licensing regime is such that only a few legal ways to transmit data from a balloon to the ground currently exist. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The transmitter module used was the Radiometrix NTX-2. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Antenna ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The antenna used is a coax dipole – this is a very simple antenna where the outer braiding of the feeding co-ax is stripped away to expose a quarter wave of inner conductor at its end. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This type of antenna was selected due to its radiation pattern – when mounted above the payload the antenna has a maximum signal strength directed at 45 degrees below horizontal – which is close to ideal given the expected range of the modules. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Interface Circuit ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | A LM324 quad op-amp was used to interface the TNC-X to the NTX-2. One of the four op amps are used to amplify the audio output form the TNC-X to the level required by the NTX-2 – the circuit also adds DC bias to fully use the NTX-2 +/-3KHz FM deviation. The other op-amp in the circuit is used as an inverter and level shifter needed to drive the NTX-2 enable input at 3V. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ** Figure 3 - Interface Circuit Diagram ** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Power Supply ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The power supply used was a 6V Lithium photo battery with a LE50CZ low dropout regulator (with appropriate de-coupling). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Ground Station ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ground-station Antenna – 7 element 434MHz “ZL” | ||
+ | |||
+ | Accurate pointing of the antenna proved to be critical - especially when the balloon was at distance. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** Figure 4 - Antenna on tripod mount ** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Results ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The tested path distance was 33Km (27Km downrange 19.4Km up) at this range the system was approaching limit of reliable communication – with about 50% of packets being lost. At this point in the fight the transmitter completely stopped transmitting – in all probability due to a temperature effect of some kind. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Improvements ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Tune up signal** – A signal to allow manual peaking of the antenna direction. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *A **longer receive antenna** could be used – a antenna double the length of the existing antenna would not be unwieldy or present too much of a problem to align – this should provide an additional 3db of gain (40% in terms of distance) | ||
+ | |||
+ | *The addition of a **low noise pre amplifier** at the antenna output might improve the overall signal to noise ratio (depending upon the receiver) | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Slightly **wider transmit deviation** could be used and still remain within the narrow-band channel – this would improve the signal to noise ratio. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | A combination of these improvements might at best double the overall communication distance to about 60Km. |